If you really claim to utilize the best science, why is BLM proposing to fundamentally change the way we manage these forests on flawed science?

Their sacrifices highlight why it is a strategic imperative to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific.

We need to remember that those U.S. lands in the Pacific, including the-then U.S. territories of Hawaii and the Philippines, were directly attacked and in some cases occupied by an aspiring imperialist dictatorship attempting to conquer…

If you go back to Teddy Roosevelt, he said that conservation means development as much as protection.

We have asked for that information, and nobody has been able to provide it so far.

But it is really hard to come in here and talk about increased money for firefighting, when that is just putting a Band-Aid on the wound instead of going to the symptom of what is causing the problem.

Secretary Haaland said there were 20. Can you get that list for us?

the U.S. compacts with the FAS countries are a balance of extraordinary security and defense right and strategic stability secured for the United States, and extraordinary economic gains and stability for the Freely Associated States.

It needs to start with mining, though. We need that ore, and this is an opportunity to extract that ore domestically.

I mean, up or down? Towards gravity or away from gravity?

How long does it take to permit a mine in Canada in this area?

Our own regulations are killing us.