I think it is a mistake sometimes to just sit back and say, well, we are going to wait on the Iraqi army to get its act together.

I hope that you will be clear and firm in your recommendation to the President if you believe this plan we have today, date-specific withdrawal, is in error.

I believe the Appropriations Committee has already voted out that same spending level, and it is on the floor.

I hope that you understand that you have to give us the straight facts, tell us what you believe, and, if there are problems, I'll--bring them forward to us, and I believe Congress will respond if in any way possible.

I just believe that the fact that we have a crisis internationally and we need to spend more on defense does not require that this Nation spend more on non-defense.

It has been my experience that when U.S. forces have accompanied Iraqis... those units are more effective.

Right now, we don't think the Russians want to kill us, but the ISIS [Islamic State of Iraq and Syria]--ISIL [the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant] does.

Frankly, I think General Dempsey and Secretary Carter following up on that were not very persuasive either in convincing me or the American people that we have a good plan.

I think Congress believes you're correct. But, I hope you will keep us informed on that, because some would suggest otherwise.

It does not say that ICE has an opinion about this, it says they shall be deported.

I agree we need to make it sound, and it is not your responsibility. It is ours.

I hope Ms. Lynch can fix these flaws.

I think we are running out of money because it is not actuarially sound, is it?

I do not think we are going that way.

I do not believe, and totally reject the idea that if Congress fails to act, then the President is entitled to act.

The problem is your policies. Tax more, spend more, borrow more, regulate more, Obamacare more.

this is what distinguishes the Yuma Sector from the others--it is the success with this program.

I agree with Senator Sanders that the middle class is really hurting.

It seems to me that they are arguing that 'take care that the laws be executed' means you have to do the best you can to enforce the laws under the circumstances.

This is catastrophic. This is absolutely one of the most dangerous trends we have seen in some time.

We are not going to allow this to become a political body that just conducts its work in haphazard, political, reactive ways.

Do you believe that the President has a right to take action in violation of law just because Congress refused to pass a law he asked them to pass?

I do believe the President of the United States has failed to look the American people in the eye and tell them we are on an unsustainable financial path.

We have reached a lawless stage in immigration and the American people are not happy about it.

Do you believe the Executive action announced by President Obama on November 20 is legal and constitutional, just yes or no?