Mark Begich
The Public Record
Mark Begich is an American politician who served as the U.S. Senator from Alaska from 2009 to 2014. A member of the Democratic Party, he focused on issues such as healthcare, veterans' affairs, and economic development during his time in office. Begich was known for his efforts to advocate for Alaska's unique needs and challenges, including those related to energy and the environment.
Can you tell me, you know--and I will be very Alaska-centric here for a second in regards to the Arctic and the Arctic development--
Specifically, we ask the committee to: (1) acknowledge the importance of educational innovation by endorsing initiatives like the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Education (ARPA-ED) and the aforementioned Investing in Innovation…
I wish to speak about legislation I am introducing today that would repeal an ill-fitting and broad-reaching rule that limits not only timber harvest and mining but important renewable energy projects in Southeast Alaska. In March of this…
I rise to speak briefly about progress in the nation of Croatia, which I was honored to visit recently. At the invitation of the Croatian Minister of Defense, I participated in what is known as the ``Croatian Summit,'' a gathering of…
I wish to say thank you for the opportunity to put on the Record my experiences in Croatia this last weekend and, again, seeing the country after 15 years ago going through incredible devastation to where they are today. I yield the floor…
before I talk about the budget, I wish to commend the Senator from Georgia. As someone who has been in the real estate business for many years, such as the Senator from Georgia, he is absolutely right. If homeowners are stuck with a…
I am on the floor this afternoon to talk about the issue not only of the day, the week, the month, the year, it is the issue about what to do about the deficit. Everyone around here knows that if we fail to raise the debt ceiling by the…
My gut tells me it's not worth the money; we should put that into what we know.
We have zero capability to respond in the Arctic right now. And we've got to do better than that.
Does that make sense? It's kind of like what we're doing on the military side, it's always the international BRAC, the domestic BRAC, we're always, kind of, turning.
And now what's happening, the House Republicans are trying to compound the problem by giving the Coast Guard even fewer resources.
Because some of these things are so darn old that, you know, you're going to be floating one day, and it's not going to be powered by anything other than, hopefully, a sail, you know.
I want to let you know, in the state legislature in Alaska, they've allocated I think just shy of $2 million.
the best thing is to decommission POLAR SEA, and devote all our resources into POLAR STAR
the opportunity up there, is unbelievable from the oil and gas, to mineral, the fishing, transportation components
What keeps me awake at night--an oil spill, a collision. A ship sinking in the Arctic keeps me awake at night.
Would a multi-year authorization on capitalization be helpful to get these longer-term kind of agreements?
I think the High Latitude Study will show a need for a range of icebreakers.
I think minimum is the right word--at least two operational, large-scale icebreakers, at minimum.





