It would be outrageous, really, if this small family-run business has to stop providing a service for local families with pets because the cost of compliance with the regulations, of dubious environmental benefit at least in this instance…
Lisa Murkowski
The Public Record
Lisa Ann Murkowski is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from Alaska, a position she has held since 2002. A member of the Republican Party, Murkowski has been a prominent figure in Alaskan and national politics, known for her moderate stance on various issues. She was first appointed to the Senate in 2002 and has since been elected multiple times, demonstrating a strong commitment to her constituents and the state of Alaska.
I have to tell you, I am concerned about what we have seen coming out of the Circuit Court here.
I hear more complaints from the people of Alaska about the EPA than any other Agency out there.
Thank you for your letter of April 24, 2013, cosigned by Senator Ron Wyden, regarding the impact of sequestration on payments under the Secure Rural Schools Act.
We talk a lot around here about cost benefit analysis at times of declining budget. It is important.
the EPA is using what they consider to be some overly optimistic forecasts that overstate the benefits of regulation and understates their cost.
I understand that but I am also very worried that as we are dealing with these determinations now in your budget in terms of where that shortfall is, if there is a discrepancy in the numbers we need to know in a timely manner what IHS…
I think it is important to really understand in fairness how we have arrived at these analyses
Our Governor Parnell sent a letter to you on April 28 refusing to pay back the funds, citing the lack of any legal authority offered by the USFS.
the notion that the State must pay for the final lands entitled to it under the statehood act is equally wrongheaded.
Well, let me ask for clarification on that because, as we know, when Shell was moving forward as the only entity, the only producer up there, the plans were very specific as to Shell's operations.
This is something that isn't setting well with the people in the State of Alaska, and it clearly doesn't set well with me.
the outcry from tribes from folks back home on this particular issue is really loud. It's quite intense.
I have questioned that at a time where budgets are very, very tight, we would be purchasing more land when we're not able to adequately care for, maintain, provide the resources for what it is that we have.
the trust responsibility that the Federal Government owes to our first peoples is very important to me.
I worry that we don't have our operators who are able to hold on until we can transition to that second growth.
I think that this decision by the agency represents the latest in a long line of misguided Forest Service actions that have had a crippling impact on Southeast Alaska.





