What do we seek to prevent, no matter how we prevent it, and, if necessary, alone?
Dan Sullivan
The Public Record
Daniel Scott Sullivan is an American politician and attorney currently serving as the junior United States senator from Alaska, a position he has held since January 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Sullivan has focused on issues such as national security, economic development, and energy policy during his tenure in the Senate. He has also been involved in various committees, including the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.
I believe that in the future, whoever holds blank--this place--will hold the world. It is the most important strategic place in the world.
One of the best things the military does for its servicemembers and veterans is provide educational assistance and training in the form of the G.I. Bill.
There is a quantitative difference between the service of our military members and other Federal employees; benefits and healthcare should reflect this disparity.
Without a multi-year funding, we have to focus more than we would like on short-term and smaller projects.
We do need an infrastructure bill, we need a Highway Bill, one that delivers for transportation needs across the entire United States.
Strong and stable Federal funding, along with flexibility that reduces requirements, will help States provide the transportation system that the Nation needs.
So that exercise right now, as described in the Alaska Dispatch, is a direct result of you preparing for a sequestration?
Is sequestration driving this focus in the Army to look at 30 different installations, including brigades, in Alaska?
Alaska is one of the most strategic, most important military places that we have in this country.
Alaska is a front-runner for a future F-35 basing, something that we are quite excited about.
I think we all see that we are struggling with the issues of sequestration, with the issues of readiness, but with the broader issues of how our fiscal situation in this country actually impacts national security.
I think it is important that the people that we represent also hear what the potential for local impacts could be with regard to sequestration.
They call it the 'new normal' here in Washington, which I think is a very dangerous comment.
How much better would our national security be if we were able to bust out of this 1.5 percent growth?
What has enabled China's tremendous military buildup? It has been a booming Chinese economy.
I think there's broad agreement that seems, certainly among the three of you, I think among all the panelists here, on the importance of a comprehensive strategy that integrates all elements of American power.
I just think they do not like hydrocarbons. They do not like talking about exporting LNG and oil.
It is actually in the agreement that any type of reimposition of sanctions allows Iran to walk away from the deal.





