To me when the leader of an agency comes to a State and makes those kinds of statements to a national newspaper, it doesn't show that you are focused on serving the people you are required to serve.
Dan Sullivan
The Public Record
Daniel Scott Sullivan is an American politician and attorney currently serving as the junior United States senator from Alaska, a position he has held since January 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Sullivan has focused on issues such as national security, economic development, and energy policy during his tenure in the Senate. He has also been involved in various committees, including the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.
There are a lot of people who disagree with that. We would like to see your legal opinion that gives you the authority to propose this rule.
That is the big issue right now. You said you didn't do that in your clean air issue and, a lot of States sued.
I think one of the things they are most concerned about is two interrelated themes that most Alaskans, I would say the vast majority, is concerned about.
I do not think anyone wants to jeopardize the environment, but 8 years to permit a bridge in America--I do not think anyone wants that, Democrats, Republicans.
I would welcome your commitment. We are going to work on legislation, based on some of the things that you are proposing, to make that permitting system more efficient, timely, and certain so we can get Americans back to work.
One of the big failures I think of this administration is when you look at where we are on economic growth
I think that would be a disaster if we start looking at that as the new normal.
Do you think if we removed one or two BCTs from Alaska, do you think that would show that we're committed to a rebalance or undermine our rebalance commitment?
I think we've lacked credibility. When we say something that we're going to do as a country, we need to do it.
I believe we need to make sure this rebalance and optimization of our military forces in the region is credible.
It seems a little backwards in what we are doing, no OPLAN and reducing forces when we should have an OPLAN that actually guides the strategy.
I think also the best way to take care of our troops is to train them hard to make sure when and if they go to war, they come back alive.
I think your testimony highlights the growing threat, the ICBM threat, whether it's from North Korea, whether it's from Iran.
The strategic location of Alaska cannot be overstated. Location, location, location.
Things aren't looking great, and I think that you and the members of the military recognize that.
I think there is growing agreement, certainly here, about the importance of defense spending, and how we, certainly, think, I think most Americans think, we face a lot of threats in the world.
We proudly wear the title of the State that has the most veterans per capita of any State in the country.
There are a couple things going on here that give a sense of frustration from the Members.





