If their panegyric had been answered with an invective, (bating the difference in point of eloquence,) the one would have been as good as the other: that is, they would both of them have been good for nothing.
Edmund Burke: “If their panegyric had been answered with an invective, (bating the difference in point of eloquence,) the one would…”
On the record
Said by
Edmund Burke
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Burke suggests that both praise and criticism of the French Revolution should be equally subject to scrutiny.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Jan 1, 1790
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
Jan 1, 1790
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.
Jan 1, 1790
As he is not to obey us, but we are to obey the law in him, our Constitution has made no sort of provision towards rendering him, as a servant, in any degree responsible.





