On the recordJanuary 1, 1790
As he is not to obey us, but we are to obey the law in him, our Constitution has made no sort of provision towards rendering him, as a servant, in any degree responsible.
Said by
Edmund Burke
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Explaining the British constitutional framework, Burke clarifies that the king is not accountable to the people, but rather the people obey the law embodied in him, rendering him irresponsible as a servant.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Jan 1, 1790
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.
Jan 1, 1790
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
Jan 1, 1790
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
Jan 1, 1790
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…
Other voices in this conversation
