I am not really saying do not be involved. I am saying try to help in some way, but really think seriously before we say...
But you do think they are.
I am not very excited about.
Why does everybody have to ask 'Mother, may I?' to the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers if they just want to build a ...
If they don't discharge pollutants, why do they need a permit?
Wouldn't it be more effective just to set the guidelines for the homebuilders to follow and not require them to get perm...
It is deeply, profoundly, obviously undemocratic to limit speech about who to elect to public office.
It would give the Government complete control--complete control--over the political speech of its citizens.
Attempts to weaken the First Amendment--such as the proposal before this Committee--should, therefore, pass the highest ...
When it comes to free speech, we should not substitute the incumbent-protection desires of politicians for the protectio...
This is really great if you are a corporation that owns a newspaper.
The recourse to being criticized is not to shut up your fellow citizens.
Freedom of the press has never been understood to give the media special constitutional rights denied to others.
It would empower incumbent politicians in Congress and in the States to write the rules on who gets to speak and who doe...
The proposed amendment has it exactly backward.
We Republicans have put together a responsible and constitutional campaign reform agenda. It would restrict the power of...
What precedent would this amendment create?
It is outrageous to say that limiting speech is necessary for democracy.
