I rise today to express some serious concern over the use of workforce investment funds to offset 2001 supplemental appropriations. While I do support additional appropriations for the purposes outlined in the underlying bill, dramatically reducing funding for State and local workforce development programs to pay for it does not seem prudent. Again, I recognize the pressures placed on the appropriators, but I would have expected that the Members responsible for oversight of such programs would have been consulted as to the impact of such cuts on the program's ability to fulfill its purpose. The programs authorized by the Workforce Investment Act were agreed to through a strong bipartisan process, led by Senators DeWine, Kennedy, Jeffords, Wellstone, and myself. I fear, given the apparent willingness to cut funding for the act, that we did too good of a job in 1998 when Workforce Investment Act was enacted.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns over funding cuts to workforce development programs during Senate debate.
Share
More from Mike Enzi
I rise today to discuss our Federal finances and the need to address our unsustainable fiscal debt and deficit. The Federal budget has already been on an unsustainable path before COVID-19 reached our shores and before the pandemic and our…
I thank the Senator. I got to meet this delightful lady in Thermopolis, WY, some 70 years ago. I need to tell you a little bit about Thermopolis, WY, and how I wound up there. During the war, my dad was a welder on ships, and after the…
I ask unanimous consent to start the vote now. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
I rise to submit to the Senate the budget scorekeeping report for June 2020. This is my first scorekeeping report since I filed the deemed budget resolution for fiscal year 2021 on May 4, 2020, as required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of…





