If my colleagues are so concerned about unemployment, why would they do something that would eliminate jobs in this country? If my colleagues are so concerned about helping poor families, why would they do something that hurts poor families the most? Their effort to increase the minimum wage, while attacking the President on job creation, is not based on sound policy and economics. It is time for us to look beyond the smokescreen and see who is really helped and who is really hurt by Senator Kennedy's amendment to raise the Federal minimum wage. Every student who has taken an economics course knows if you increase the price of something--in this case, the minimum wage job--you decrease the demand for those jobs.
Mike Enzi: “If my colleagues are so concerned about unemployment, why would they do something that would eliminate jobs in this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Boxer-Kennedy amendment to raise the Federal minimum wage.
Share
More from Mike Enzi
I ask unanimous consent to speak for a few minutes as if in morning business. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Tribute to John David Arnold
I rise to speak about the Great American Outdoors Act that we may be debating this week. I am hoping that we can find a responsible way to pay for the maintenance backlog of our national parks. Our national parks are an important source of…
section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, BBEDCA, establishes statutory limits on discretionary spending and allows for various adjustments to those limits. In addition, sections 302 and 314(a) of the…
I rise today to acknowledge the retirement of my friend, Dr. Jim Naramore. Dr. Naramore is retiring after 40 years of service practicing family medicine in Gillette, WY. He has been an outstanding doctor to many patients in Gillette…





