let me express my thanks to the Senator from California and her staff for accommodating us in conversations last evening on some of the less vexing, but, nonetheless, significant portions of this bill. I appreciate a willingness to listen to these things from a public lands management standpoint. There are two little statements that I wish to make. One is on the sixth amendment. I just want to say that I am very happy that the Senator from California has agreed to drop the Cady Mountains area from the wilderness designation. Doing so will allow the Hidden Valley residual repository to continue to seek regulatory approval. While it does not guarantee--and I stress that I understand that it does not guarantee--that the repository proposal can go forward, it leaves the project in the same situation that it is in today. I thank Senator Feinstein for accommodating this concern. On the issue of access to non-Federal property, I again want to commend the Senator from California for accommodating a concern regarding access to the private property of Americans. My amendment seeks to give some assurance that private property owners will have adequate access to their property, whether they are awaiting acquisition by appropriate Federal authorities or, should they desire, to remain an inholder. My amendment assures that not only will access be provided, but it will also be adequate for the reasonable use and enjoyment of that owner's property.
Malcolm Wallop: “let me express my thanks to the Senator from California and her staff for accommodating us in conversations last evening…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to public lands management and private property access.
Share
More from Malcolm Wallop
I say to my friend, we are not. There is still a possibility that Senator Hatfield will offer his PILT amendment yet tonight. They are trying to work it out. They are close to having it worked out, but it is not worked out, and it is his…
so $125 million is a lot more than the Secretary says is needed. And I have found with the Secretary that times are fluid; that he can say whatever is necessary to be said to achieve whatever result is necessary to achieve without regard…
let me talk just a couple of minutes about the studies. There is a lot of wingding that goes on around this thing. The two studies mentioned in 1979 and 1987 have no management review. They are not traditional studies that the Park Service…
if we are truly seeking answers, we must face reality: We are not getting them. The Clintons are either unwilling or unable to provide thorough, complete, and factually accurate answers, even after being hounded and cajoled. As the…





