I think the Senator from Utah has made a clear point. The costs are real. The costs of doing this are very real. The benefits, however, are theoretical. I see my colleague and friend from Idaho here. I ask him, who elected the Environmental Protection Agency? Because we sure know the American people are against these increased costs for energy and these job- killing regulations.
Share & report
More from John Barrasso
The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator from Alabama (Mrs. Britt).
The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator from Pennsylvania (Mr. McCormick). The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 67, nays 32, as follows: [Rollcall Vote No. 194 Ex.] YEAS--67 Banks Barrasso Bennet Blackburn Boozman Britt Budd…
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Missouri (Mr. Hawley), the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. Mullin), and the Senator from Kentucky (Mr. Paul).
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. Mullin) and the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Thune). Further, if present and voting: the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Thune) would have voted ``yea.''
Other voices in this conversation
