over the weekend, countries meeting in Paris signed a broad new climate agreement. President Obama called the agreement a success. He said it was a ``strong agreement.'' Despite the fanfare, let's keep some things in perspective. There are important parts of this agreement that can do a great deal of damage to American jobs and the American economy. That should be and is a big concern to the American people. Parts of the agreement can do damage to our jobs and our economy. At the same time, important parts are not binding on other countries. The American people are right to wonder if the White House has signed yet another terrible deal just to try to shore up the President's legacy. Earlier this year, President Obama was so anxious, so desperate to get a deal with Iran over its nuclear program that the President signed a terrible deal. Since then, the International Atomic Energy Agency said that Iran has ``seriously undermined'' the agency's ability to verify what Iran has done. Here we are again. It is another bad deal, and other countries that signed it are already ignoring it. India is the world's third largest emitter of carbon. The agreement was on Saturday. This agreement tied plans to meet their emissions targets to getting U.S. taxpayer dollars. Then on Monday--just yesterday--India said it has plans to double its coal output by 2020. Is that what President Obama calls, in his mind, a success?…
Share
More from John Barrasso
America’s small refiners are unsung heroes of affordable American energy. Washington D.C., often overlooks them. Working families depend on them," Barrasso said on the Senate floor earlier this week.
Senate Republicans know that the first duty of government is to prioritize the safety of the American people.
It would weaken the President’s legitimate, constitutional authority. This body, the United States Senate, is being asked whether the President of the United States has the authority to arrest indicted criminals. Of course he does…
I come to the floor having heard the minority leader come to the floor, and what he said was that the Democrats are going to vote against funding the Department of Homeland Security. Yesterday, the Democrats received the legislative text…





