On the recordMay 31, 2023
And normally, under CERCLA, the polluter pays, but if the substance is there, and the polluter can't be identified, the ratepayer could pay. Correct?
Source
congress.govAnd normally, under CERCLA, the polluter pays, but if the substance is there, and the polluter can't be identified, the ratepayer could pay. Correct?
Lummis highlights the potential burden on ratepayers if polluters are unidentified.
Share
More from Cynthia M. Lummis
That is really good advice. That is just red tape upon red tape. It hurts the Tribes as much as anybody, perhaps more than anybody, who is dealing with compliance issues.
So if your ultimate goal is to provide real consumer protection, shouldn't the SEC withdraw Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 to allow banks to provide custody?
The problems that you are solving with your approaches are extremely important.