I make a point of order against the amendment. It is violative of clause 2 of rule XXI because it proposes changes that require a new determination that is not within the purview and scope of the current bill. I respectfully ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? The gentleman from New Mexico is recognized.
Share
More from Cynthia Lummis
If we trust that system to protect a checking account, we should trust it enough to protect the vote. That is not extremism. That is common sense, and it is long past time this chamber treat it that way."
The SAVE Act does not reinvent our elections. It does not add red tape for the sake of red tape. It asks for documentary proof of citizenship at registration and identification at the ballot box."
Under Governor Newsom, Sacramento has decided it can dictate what Wyoming families drive and what equipment our small businesses use. That ends today.
It is time to delist the grizzly in our area and let science, not politics, dictate our wildlife policy.
Other voices in this conversation
