I cannot see any format where a constitutional amendment, which would take years to ratify--all we are doing is sending this to the States, if we did do it, and let them decide. I know of nothing in my background that would lead me to believe that we would have done anything with section 201 of the Social Security Act, either F or D or any provision therein.
Discussing the implications of a constitutional amendment related to the Social Security Act.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding time. Madam Chair, I rise today in opposition to H.R. 8294, the six-bill fiscal year 2023 appropriations package that includes the Energy and Water Development appropriations bill. Unfortunately, these…
This bipartisan en bloc was developed in coordination with our colleagues across the aisle. It contains noncontroversial amendments addressing important issues in this bill that have been agreed to by both sides. For example, the…
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding time. Madam Speaker, I rise today in reluctant opposition to H.R. 4502, the seven-bill fiscal year 2022 appropriations package that includes the Energy and Water Development appropriations bill. I had…
We are looking at sterilization of some of those and the success or not success rate of what we are doing, but I guess the expert on this whole issue was the former Congressman from Utah (Mr. Stewart). He worked on this continuously…
Other voices in this conversation
