I rise to introduce today the Comprehensive Immigration and Asylum Reform Act of 1994. This measure addresses so many of the various serious immigration and asylum problems which have been ``the stuff of headlines'' and debate in this country for the past year and much longer. As jobless rates remain high, and as State and local governments struggle with the cost of education, public assistance, and health care, and as there is great stress on the criminal justice system during these times of economic pain, we frequently hear in frustration, that ``something must be done'' about immigration--legal and illegal. There are many studies and many opinions on the economic costs and benefits of immigration. Some believe we should have open borders. I happen to think that is about the most absurd viewpoint that could ever be expressed, because the first duty of a sovereign nation is to control its borders. Some feel there should be no limit on the number of immigrants we could admit to our benefit. Others argue that immigration, legal and illegal, is costing State and local governments billions of dollars every year in public-funded services. I believe that legal immigration has been and can continue to be of great benefit to the United States, but only if the newcomers can be comfortably absorbed into the American community.…
Editor's note · Context
Introducing the Comprehensive Immigration and Asylum Reform Act of 1994.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
All I know is if you reduce my salary to a dollar, you effectively fired me. Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from…
I thank the chairman for yielding. First, let me say I appreciate the work the chairman has done over the last several months trying to get our regular appropriations bills done and then trying to get this CR finished when it became…
I claim the time in opposition. The CHAIR. The gentleman from Idaho is recognized for 5 minutes.
I would suggest that if the gentlewoman has a problem with the Rock Springs area, that the gentlewoman address that specifically, but this cuts 50 percent of the BLM across the board. That means it is going to substantially impact Idaho…





