In the year 1992 our Senate colleagues directed over $500,000 to go to charities as a result of speeches which they made. By current law, not one cent of those funds went into any Member's pockets. In 1991, the amount was over $762,000. These funds go to organizations such as the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, the American Cancer Society, universities, community colleges, environmental and Conservation causes, scholarship programs, veterans groups, and many other worthwhile charitable and educational institutions. I believe this kind of work which Senators do to benefit charities is most commendable. This bill would have banned that type of activity entirely. I was prepared to offer an amendment which would have continued current law regarding charitable honoraria. Since my amendment became known to my old friend, Senator Carl Levin, the author of the legislation, he and I and our respective staff members have engaged in fruitful negotiations. I think we have achieved a solution which will allow these types of worthwhile organizations to continue to receive proceeds from honoraria.
Alan Simpson: “In the year 1992 our Senate colleagues directed over $500,000 to go to charities as a result of speeches which they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of a bill on charitable contributions during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding time. Madam Speaker, I rise today in reluctant opposition to H.R. 4502, the seven-bill fiscal year 2022 appropriations package that includes the Energy and Water Development appropriations bill. I had…
I see that we are going to have several Holman rules coming up. When the Holman rule was originally put in place years ago, it was meant to identify people who had committed crimes and we have had some of those that have been fired. It…
I would suggest that if the gentlewoman has a problem with the Rock Springs area, that the gentlewoman address that specifically, but this cuts 50 percent of the BLM across the board. That means it is going to substantially impact Idaho…
I have listened very carefully so far. So far I haven't heard anything that is not a policy difference. Again, I will repeat: Elections have consequences. Again, I will tell you I don't think this is constitutional. I don't believe it has…





