I want to express that. This is a singular amendment based upon the majority recommendations from the Jordan commission. We have seen fit to see that it is an issue that will be discussed, voted on, whichever way it goes, and then move on. I think once we finish this amendment, things will move in a swifter fashion. But just let me say this to kind of summarize some things that have occurred during the debate. Please understand that I think what my friend, Senator Feingold, was talking about--parents--there is no change in my amendment in the definition of ``immediate family,'' none. Parents, minor children, spouses, no change. That, I think, is unfortunate; and perhaps it may have been misconstrued. But there is no change in the definition of ``immediate family'' in what I am doing.
Alan Simpson: “I want to express that. This is a singular amendment based upon the majority recommendations from the Jordan commission.…”
On the recordApril 25, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to family definitions during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
Mar 13, 2025
In your country club, your church and business, about 15% of the people are screwballs, lightweights and boobs, and you would not want those people unrepresented in Congress.
Mar 13, 2025
We have two political parties in this country, the Stupid Party and the Evil Party. I belong to the Stupid Party.
Nov 2, 2023
I have no further speakers on this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Nov 2, 2023
So far, I have heard accusations, but I haven't heard anything. Has she been convicted of any of this kind of stuff? I don't know. I haven't heard of any of that. Believe me, I disagree with the Secretary on a lot of issues. So far all I…





