But let us be very clear. I say to Senator DeWine and Senator Craig--let me tell you, the law before 1986 was that the INS could go do a warrantless search, ladies and gentlemen. Before we changed the law, with this linkage of the ACLU and the agricultural workers and the growers, the law of the United States was just like this for everybody else. The FBI could go into a field in plain view for a body or drugs, and with a warrantless search go forward. The INS could do that, the FBI could do that, the DEA. In 1986 we changed it. So the requirement that we have now is the special law. That is what is fascinating in this debate, I must say. I just think I have been here too long. This was on the books. There is not a single other law enforcement agency in the United States, when they come upon an open field and in plain view see something that gives them probable cause to believe there is a violation of the law--they go and do it. The only agency of the Federal Government that cannot is the INS. That is where we are. At least let us be realistic about what we have done. We retain it. That is the way it is. Move on to the next item of business. But let us be totally candid. And let us not have anybody with their own opinion; let us all have our own facts. That was the law before 1986.
Alan Simpson: “But let us be very clear. I say to Senator DeWine and Senator Craig--let me tell you, the law before 1986 was that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes to INS warrantless search laws during a debate.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
We are looking at sterilization of some of those and the success or not success rate of what we are doing, but I guess the expert on this whole issue was the former Congressman from Utah (Mr. Stewart). He worked on this continuously…
Reclaiming my time, I thank the gentleman for drawing the House's attention to the Department of the Interior and Bureau of Land Management's responsibilities under the Mineral Leasing Act. I would be pleased to continue to work with him…
I would just say that I am very disappointed that the gentleman doesn't agree with us that we ought to reduce spending because that is what these bills have been doing. Anybody who suggests we are going to stop the debt clock overnight is…
I claim the time in opposition. The CHAIR. The gentleman from Idaho is recognized for 5 minutes.





