On the recordMay 25, 2016
I do understand the gentleman's concern. In fact, this is an issue we hear about from quite a few Members. The administration's insistence on budgeting on tonnage alone with no other consideration is shortsighted. That is why this bill provides additional funding specifically for small navigation projects, and the report encourages the administration to correct its budget criteria. Unfortunately, the gentleman's amendment would establish priority in funding for specific projects. That is not something I can support, particularly in light of the House prohibition on congressional earmarks. I would urge my colleague to withdraw his amendment and instead continue to work with the committee to show the administration the importance of small navigation projects.
