that would be a good argument if we were saying that we were going to ``use it to reduce the deficit.'' But it will have already been used because the minute there are surpluses in the Social Security trust funds, they are invested in T bills or notes or whatever, and all the money goes to the general fund. If we can get to the point where you and I are, will you please describe to all of us what you mean when you are describing ``looting and raiding'' of the trust fund?
Alan Simpson: “that would be a good argument if we were saying that we were going to ``use it to reduce the deficit.'' But it will have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of using Social Security surpluses during a debate.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
I understand the frustration that the gentlewoman expresses in her statement, but I must rise in opposition to this amendment. The Bureau of Land Management's funding level is already $255.4 million, or 18 percent below the FY23 enacted…
All I know is if you reduce my salary to a dollar, you effectively fired me. Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from…
This bipartisan en bloc was developed in coordination with our colleagues across the aisle. It contains noncontroversial amendments addressing important issues in this bill that have been agreed to by both sides. For example, the…
First, let me say that I am not totally opposed to what the gentleman is trying to do. I think these air tours are important, but I think it is wrong to say they can't place any limitations on them. The gentleman raises the point that they…





