I speak in opposition to the amendment. This is an extension of a measure first introduced in 1989. It is something that declares entire groups in the former Soviet Union and in Southeast Asia as subject to persecution and thus entitled to refugee status under our laws. I have been on this one a long time, as I say, and I know people are tired of it. You cannot pick an issue more fraught with emotion, fear, guilt, and racism than when you are in the area of refugees and immigration. I know there will be smatterings of that in this debate. It never is ever far removed. Debate about who is a political refugee and who is an economic migrant has proceeded vigorously in recent years, but very little is said about the slide of U.S. refugee policy into pure politics, just as illustrated by this amendment by my friend from New Jersey. And I respect Frank Lautenberg thoroughly. He and I have worked together on many issues. The pressures he has on this amendment are total. I have watched it over the years. Under our Refugee Act and under the United Nations Convention and Protocol, a refugee is a person with a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. That is a refugee. The way we determine refugees is on a case-by-case basis, which is the only sane and sensible way to determine who is a refugee.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker opposes an amendment related to refugee status for groups from the former Soviet Union and Southeast Asia.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding time. Madam Speaker, I rise today in reluctant opposition to H.R. 4502, the seven-bill fiscal year 2022 appropriations package that includes the Energy and Water Development appropriations bill. I had…
We are looking at sterilization of some of those and the success or not success rate of what we are doing, but I guess the expert on this whole issue was the former Congressman from Utah (Mr. Stewart). He worked on this continuously…
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment which seeks to eliminate funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. While I support the gentleman's spending, this bill already significantly…
I would just say that I am very disappointed that the gentleman doesn't agree with us that we ought to reduce spending because that is what these bills have been doing. Anybody who suggests we are going to stop the debt clock overnight is…





