No. It's not even necessary to be a climate change skeptic to be an EPA greenhouse gas regulations skeptic. These regulations are all economic pain for little, if any, environmental gain. EPA can only regulate American companies, and we know that China already emits more carbon dioxide than we do. Its rate of emissions growth is many times faster than ours, and the Chinese Government has repeatedly made clear that they will never impose such job-destroying regulatory measures on themselves. Even Administrator Lisa Jackson, as you said, has concluded that unilateral action would have little or negligible impact on further temperatures.
Alan Simpson: “No. It's not even necessary to be a climate change skeptic to be an EPA greenhouse gas regulations skeptic. These…”
On the recordFebruary 16, 2011
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses skepticism towards EPA greenhouse gas regulations and their economic implications.
Share
More from Alan Simpson
Nov 2, 2023
I would just say that I am very disappointed that the gentleman doesn't agree with us that we ought to reduce spending because that is what these bills have been doing. Anybody who suggests we are going to stop the debt clock overnight is…
Nov 2, 2023
I have no further speakers on this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Nov 2, 2023
Drastically reducing funding for the Wild Horse and Burro Program would have a devastating effect on our Western lands and the work we have done to manage the herd. For these reasons, I must oppose this amendment. I thank the gentleman for…





