Shelley Moore Capito

I would agree now is not the time for us to take the foot off the pedal when we're starting to see these early breakthroughs that affect so many families across the country.

I know we're dealing with a tight budget year this year, but investments in biomedical research are so important for the future of our country.

NIH funding has seen almost a 60 percent increase for the last 8 years.

I think we've got to do a really deep down analysis, but I think where we really need to--and you all are doctors and thank goodness you are, but sometimes we need to communicate in plain language what is actually going on.

I really want to thank you and Senator Reed for the initial passage of the Star Act and its reauthorization this year.

We need to do this together, work together.

I want to ask you about the flat funding in Alzheimer's which makes absolutely no sense to me when we see the raging numbers.

Supported funding for biomedical research at NIH has long been a bicameral, bipartisan priority.

I think one of the values in this particular exercise is for the soldiers to get ahold of some of the newer technology or the breaking technology so that it's not stuck in this developmental phase and you can actually see what's in a…

I think one of the values in this particular exercise is for the soldiers to get ahold of some of the newer technology or the breaking technology so that it's not stuck in this developmental phase and you can actually see what's in a…

I think one of the values in this particular exercise is for the soldiers to get ahold of some of the newer technology or the breaking technology so that it's not stuck in this developmental phase and you can actually see what's in a…

I think we need to look forward here.

You are endangering lives. You are endangering, you know, freedoms, just eroding trust.

It is almost like it was a game. You know, it was a--you are in this chat room with--supposedly, with small amounts of people.

I think we need to look forward here.

I think that is important for not just system-wide, but for us to know, and the American public to know, so a transparent process there.

I think we need to look forward here.

It is not a game. You are endangering lives. You are endangering, you know, freedoms, just eroding trust.

Now, with all due respect to the Chairman, that is an interesting emission, isn't it?

The EPA's so called Good Neighbor Rule is the latest version of a regulation that has gone by many names.

While being a good neighbor is great, we all want to be good neighbors, the name is a bit of a misnomer.

The amount that is being seized from year to year goes up. So that's good. We're seizing more, but it tells me we know it's getting through

Now, with all due respect to the Chairman, that is an interesting emission, isn't it?

So perhaps this regulation might be more aptly named the Headwind Rule, because that is what this will be for American workers and consumers.

While being a good neighbor is great, we all want to be good neighbors, the name is a bit of a misnomer.