Shelley Moore Capito

I remain an adamant supporter of our allies in Israel, and believe that we should continue to back Ukraine against Russian aggression.

With all due respect, it is not working.

I remain an adamant supporter of our allies in Israel, and believe that we should continue to back Ukraine against Russian aggression.

Here is what I am concerned about, and I think a lot, when you see the 200 from the terrorist list.

Despite the resources we provided in the IIJA, the EPA has not granted Class VI primacy to any State under this Administration.

As we continue to build on that record by passing the ADVANCE Act in the NDAA to help deploy advanced nuclear reactors and technologies.

The law also included funding for hydrogen hubs, like the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub, known as ARCH2, that will benefit my State of West Virginia and our region.

I want to thank our witnesses and our Committee for its strong bipartisan work to reduce emissions and make our infrastructure more resilient.

With all due respect, it is not working.

I remain an adamant supporter of our allies in Israel, and believe that we should continue to back Ukraine against Russian aggression.

Here is what I am concerned about, and I think a lot, when you see the 200 from the terrorist list.

As has been reiterated, 269,000 last month, over 200 on the terror watch list. Americans are right to be extremely concerned about what is happening here.

I think, also, to get to it, we have, as much as we might have a different approach to what we are trying to get here, one of the conforming themes, I think, that the Chairman and I have, and all of us have, is some kind of consistency.

I would say, to simplify there, what I am hearing is that we are going to be back at court, and this is going to be back up to the Supreme Court, the way the Administration has rewritten this rule.

It is the 51st anniversary of the Clean Water Act as we speak.

I would say, to simplify there, what I am hearing is that we are going to be back at court, and this is going to be back up to the Supreme Court, the way the Administration has rewritten this rule.

I think, also, to get to it, we have, as much as we might have a different approach to what we are trying to get here, one of the conforming themes, I think, that the Chairman and I have, and all of us have, is some kind of consistency.

It is the 51st anniversary of the Clean Water Act as we speak.

I think, also, to get to it, we have, as much as we might have a different approach to what we are trying to get here, one of the conforming themes, I think, that the Chairman and I have, and all of us have, is some kind of consistency.

I would say, to simplify there, what I am hearing is that we are going to be back at court, and this is going to be back up to the Supreme Court, the way the Administration has rewritten this rule.

Let me ask you this. I talked about the rulemaking process. They kind of skirted a little bit the rules there, in terms of public input, which is kind of ironic, because in this Committee, all we hear about is community input and how we…

It is the 51st anniversary of the Clean Water Act as we speak.

I just have one question that I can't resist asking.

I just have one question that I can't resist asking.

I think for people who are listening, too, to realize that, and I think you confirmed the figures here, $2 billion is the cost to the taxpayer every year to operate the buildings, is that correct?