I would just note that the boundary adjustment is about as small as anyone can recall, covering about 9,500 square feet, or just two-tenths of an acre. However, this adjustment is necessary to clear up a land title problem and allow the construction of a needed visitor center and facilities for the historic site. The National Park Service supports this legislation, and there is absolutely no controversy with it. I commend our colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. George Miller) for his work on the bill. I urge passage of H.R. 3706.
Nick Rahall: “I would just note that the boundary adjustment is about as small as anyone can recall, covering about 9,500 square feet…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the necessity and support for H.R. 3706 regarding a boundary adjustment for a historic site.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.
I am very honored at this time to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Bishop), the distinguished ranking member of our Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment on our Transportation Committee, although we are not in…
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.
I will miss working with you and all of my esteem colleagues from both sides of the aisle, but I know that with your leadership, and your bipartisanship, and your transparent manner of operating this committee, this Nation's future is in…





