Is not that language about the Congress acting to enforce the amendment by appropriate legislation identical to the language found in section 5 of the 14th amendment, and that has not prohibited the courts from issuing literally thousands upon thousands of orders under the 14th amendment, so why would it under this amendment?
David Cay Johnston: “Is not that language about the Congress acting to enforce the amendment by appropriate legislation identical to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the enforcement of constitutional amendments and the role of Congress and courts.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?





