Wait a minute. The statute is clear under the Chevron case, the Supreme Court case. What it said is that if the Congress has spoken on an issue and congressional intent is clear, then that congressional intent must be enforced. So that if, for example, you required that you meet 40 miles per gallon as a cafe standard, then I do not believe that the administrator could come in and say, well, look, it would be nice to go to 50 or 55 because we like that more. If Congress has spoken and the intent is clear, then you must follow congressional intent.
David Cay Johnston: “Wait a minute. The statute is clear under the Chevron case, the Supreme Court case. What it said is that if the Congress…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the enforcement of congressional intent in relation to the Chevron case.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Jul 31, 1996
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Jul 31, 1996
The point is this, though: They have tested it with weapons 30 times bigger than antitank weapons with direct hits. That caused a breach. Only a third of an ounce comes out. There are many, many much more lucrative targets, by orders of…





