Wait a minute. The statute is clear under the Chevron case, the Supreme Court case. What it said is that if the Congress has spoken on an issue and congressional intent is clear, then that congressional intent must be enforced. So that if, for example, you required that you meet 40 miles per gallon as a cafe standard, then I do not believe that the administrator could come in and say, well, look, it would be nice to go to 50 or 55 because we like that more. If Congress has spoken and the intent is clear, then you must follow congressional intent.
David Cay Johnston: “Wait a minute. The statute is clear under the Chevron case, the Supreme Court case. What it said is that if the Congress…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the enforcement of congressional intent in relation to the Chevron case.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
I want to briefly reply to a statement that was made a little earlier by the Senator from Nevada, quoting me a few years back saying that nuclear powerplants were running out of space. The fact of the matter is, that statement was true…
The difference between our treatment of the three is that we isolated Burma, and General Ne Win isolated himself, whereas, because of the cold war, we embraced the Taiwanese, we embraced the South Koreans. Today, having been isolated for…
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?





