Is the Senator aware that S. 343 does not allow judicial review at every step along the way? It simply allows an interlocutory review for three limited questions. First, whether it is a major rule; that is, whether its impact will be $50 million--and I hope we can change that to $100 million--but the size of the rule. Second, whether it is a matter affecting health, safety or the environment, which would require a risk assessment. Third, whether it would require the reg-flex for small business. And that limited appeal would have to be made in 60 days. That is not to give a lawyer's dream; that is to give certainty, so that you do not, at the end of the process, have to go back and do the peer review and the risk assessment if you were incorrect about the size of the impact of the rule. Now, that is not what he is complaining about here, that interlocutory appeal. That is a separate thing. Would the Senator not agree with me that I have correctly stated what S. 343 states, and if I have not stated it correctly, would he correct me on how I have misstated it?
David Cay Johnston: “Is the Senator aware that S. 343 does not allow judicial review at every step along the way? It simply allows an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the provisions of S. 343 regarding judicial review during Senate debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
This is sort of a version 2 of the Wellstone amendment, in that it seeks to take the rights of utilities and, secondarily, the rights of ratepayers of utilities, and abolish those by legislative fiat--which simply cannot be done. The…
Thus, we hold that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act creates an obligation in DOE to start disposing of the spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. Is there any disagreement with what I read in the decision?
I have not said the fund is sufficient. DOE has said the fund is sufficient. And many nuclear utilities do not believe it is sufficient. But the sufficiency of the fund has nothing to do with the damages to which a utility would be…
we strongly oppose the Grams-McCain amendment and strongly support the Appalachian Regional Commission at this level. Mr. President, this has been an effective program to fight poverty in Appalachia. Appalachia is still one of the most…





