I have not said the fund is sufficient. DOE has said the fund is sufficient. And many nuclear utilities do not believe it is sufficient. But the sufficiency of the fund has nothing to do with the damages to which a utility would be entitled. The fund could be more than sufficient and a utility would be entitled to damages based upon whether the Government had violated a vested right.
David Cay Johnston: “I have not said the fund is sufficient. DOE has said the fund is sufficient. And many nuclear utilities do not believe…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the sufficiency of a fund related to nuclear utilities and government obligations.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Well, as of this moment, Donald Trump is out of business in New York because all of his business certificates, business licenses in effect have been cancelled.





