For many, many years one-man-one vote was considered by the Court to be a political question. And the Supreme Court in Baker versus Carr changed that judgment and said it is no longer political; we are going to order one-man-one-vote. Now, what is there inherent in this that makes it a political question?
Discussing the Supreme Court's decision on one-man-one-vote in relation to political questions.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The point is this, though: They have tested it with weapons 30 times bigger than antitank weapons with direct hits. That caused a breach. Only a third of an ounce comes out. There are many, many much more lucrative targets, by orders of…
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?
Other voices in this conversation
