the bill that I have just introduced, which is strongly supported by the administration, amends or repeals a number of sections in the Department of Energy Organization Act and the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 that are obsolete or that are duplicative or inconsistent with other, Governmentwide statutes governing rulemaking and advisory committee management. Over the past 3 years, I have proposed, on a number of occasions, amendments to remove administrative requirements of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are more onerous than similar Governmentwide requirements contained in more general statutes. For example, with the support of the Department of Energy [DOE] and the Office of Government Ethics, I have successfully promoted the repeal of financial disclosure and divestiture requirements affecting DOE employees that were more stringent than the comparable requirements of the Ethics in Government Act and that provided potent recruitment disincentives for outstanding potential employees for the Department. This bill continues the process of placing DOE on a similar footing in administrative law to other Federal agencies.
David Cay Johnston: “the bill that I have just introduced, which is strongly supported by the administration, amends or repeals a number of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill to amend the Department of Energy Organization Act and related statutes.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The difference between our treatment of the three is that we isolated Burma, and General Ne Win isolated himself, whereas, because of the cold war, we embraced the Taiwanese, we embraced the South Koreans. Today, having been isolated for…
I am sorry that I will not be able to support the amendment. In fact, I will oppose the amendment. But nevertheless, as a courtesy to my colleague, I will offer it. What it would do is to take four-tenths of 1 percent of each program in…
the answer is, yes, these projects for biomass electric will be eligible, and the Department should give full consideration to these projects along with those mentioned in the committee report. These appear to be promising technologies…
I send a letter to the desk addressed to me dated today and signed by Terry R. Lash, Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, which details the principal arguments against terminating the advanced light water…





