I send a letter to the desk addressed to me dated today and signed by Terry R. Lash, Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, which details the principal arguments against terminating the advanced light water reactor program and, among other things, points out that in the fifth year of a 5-year program, the cost to terminate this program would exceed the Government's obligation, which is $22 million in this budget. So it would seem foolhardy at best to do so.
David Cay Johnston: “I send a letter to the desk addressed to me dated today and signed by Terry R. Lash, Director of the Office of Nuclear…”
On the recordJuly 29, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of terminating the advanced light water reactor program.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Sep 25, 2023
Well, as of this moment, Donald Trump is out of business in New York because all of his business certificates, business licenses in effect have been cancelled.
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Jul 31, 1996
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
Jul 31, 1996
The point is this, though: They have tested it with weapons 30 times bigger than antitank weapons with direct hits. That caused a breach. Only a third of an ounce comes out. There are many, many much more lucrative targets, by orders of…





