One of the myths put out about the so-called Dole-Johnston amendment is that it contains a supermandate. That is, that the present requirements of law--for example, on the Clean Air Act, when it sets standards, for example, of maximum achievable control technology or the other specific requirements of law--that somehow those are overruled by this bill. Would the Senator agree with me that the language is very clear in saying that does not happen under this bill? To quote the language, it ``supplements and does not supersede the requirements of the present law.'' And, in fact, other language in the bill specifically points out that there will be instances where, because of the requirements of present law, you cannot meet the tests of the risk justifying the cost? The benefits justifying the cost? And, in other words, the requirements of present law, under the instant Dole-Johnston amendment, would still be in effect and would not be overruled by this bill? Would the Senator agree with me?
David Cay Johnston: “One of the myths put out about the so-called Dole-Johnston amendment is that it contains a supermandate. That is, that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Dole-Johnston amendment on existing environmental laws.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
today I am introducing the DOE Reports Elimination and Streamlining Act of 1996, to implement a number of recommendations that have been received from the administration for the repeal of requirements for unnecessary or obsolete reports to…
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.
The University of New Orleans has developed an entrepreneurship program designed not only to assist in the development of skills, but also to assist in the creating of individual, family, and small businesses in our inner cities. The two…





