I commend the sentiments of the gentleman who's bringing forth this amendment. I don't for a second do anything but think that that's laudable, and I make no judgment about the merits of this case. As the gentleman describes the merits in the favor of these gentlemen, they're powerful. I mean, it sounds like the equities are running all in their favor. I make no comment on that at all because I don't know the facts. And I have read about it, and it does make one sympathetic based upon the facts as you cited. But I don't make any judgments about that. I just oppose it because I don't think this is the right forum. The President, of course, would be an appropriate forum, but that's the only basis of my concern about the amendment. So I commend the gentleman for bringing the issue to the House.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I commend the sentiments of the gentleman who's bringing forth this amendment. I don't for a second do anything but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment and expressing concerns about the appropriate forum for the issue.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I think both the chairman and the ranking member are right on when they talk about some sort of systemic reform.
if you solve the jurisdictional issue and give people power to protect themselves, then you will take care of non-Indians going on Indian reservations
They do have the right take, and she obviously has picked a substantive issue to be concerned about and defend, and the gentleman is to be commended for picking it up and fighting for her and sea turtles.
If I have any time left, Mr. Chairman, I would just point out that about 90 percent of the account where the gentleman is seeking an offset, the general administrative account, goes towards operational support for the Department of Justice…





