I would like to add to that, every law that we pass here, we pass it because we understand there is a proclivity out there to violate the laws. That is the same with the restrictions we put on Legal Services Corporation. There was a lot of this activity out there before we put these restrictions on. It is reasonable to assume there are going to be some people who are zealots, or for whatever reason, who are going to violate the rules. The gentleman is going to be pleased to know and he does know probably, because I know he is a student of the legislation that comes on the floor, that in this bill we have disbarment as punishment for those grantees who violate the restrictions that we have put on in the past. So we are addressing these concerns, and I know the gentleman would be pleased that we are addressing them, and I hope the fact we are addressing them in good faith and in a serious manner will lead the gentleman to look favorably upon the underlying purposes.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I would like to add to that, every law that we pass here, we pass it because we understand there is a proclivity out…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing restrictions on the Legal Services Corporation and addressing concerns about compliance.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
if you solve the jurisdictional issue and give people power to protect themselves, then you will take care of non-Indians going on Indian reservations
Mr. Speaker, it was with profound sadness that I learned yesterday of the passing of Senator Robert C. Byrd. This country knew Senator Byrd as one of the lions of the Senate, a ferocious advocate for his State and a principled spokesman…
If I have any time left, Mr. Chairman, I would just point out that about 90 percent of the account where the gentleman is seeking an offset, the general administrative account, goes towards operational support for the Department of Justice…
I would simply note that if this is about rights it is also about responsibilities and both are constitutionally based.





