I pointed out that the ATP program is the centerpiece of the administration's research and its strategy to maintain its competitiveness in the global marketplace. I also pointed out that this is in real competition with other countries around the world who are investing strategically, governments are investing strategically and far more deeply than the United States. Nevertheless, this program, however small relative to those other strategic investments by government and civilian technology research, it is an important program. It is a program that is getting better. It has listened to its critics who have expressed concern about too much of the money going to large corporations. The program has been reconstituted by the Secretary of Commerce, taking into consideration those concerns, so that the grantees of these monies are increasingly consortium groups, including academia, small businesses, increasingly, and, of course, large businesses also, all of it directed at precompetitive, generic technology development, which would not otherwise be undertaken by private industry. ATP is decidedly not corporate welfare. That is not what it is about. It is not about picking winners and losers. It is also not about product development. ATP is about funding the research and development efforts behind high risk technologies.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I pointed out that the ATP program is the centerpiece of the administration's research and its strategy to maintain its…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance and structure of the ATP program in relation to global competitiveness.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I just will stipulate to our concerns about trade with China and the necessity to review it. That is why we have this office. You are suggesting that we need additional funding. You are suggesting doubling the funding, which impacts Census…
this amendment, as we understand it, is merely a restatement of current law, which already prohibits the employment of unauthorized aliens. We don't read into it that it imposes any new burden on those who are using funds appropriated…
I'm pleased to discuss this matter with the gentleman. This issue was brought before the committee rather late, after we had marked up. The point was made on a bipartisan basis that the authorization for this program was not adequate. We…
I commend the Administration for doing that, and doing it in a way that is very sensitive to the national security concerns.





