let me tell you how fascinating it is for me to see you in your role tonight, and also see my good friend, the gentleman from California, Frank Riggs, back here after a 2-year absence because it was 4 years ago that Frank and I and five other freshmen blew the whistle on the House bank and then 3 years ago we blew the whistle on the House post office. The interesting thing, Mr. Speaker, is that after 4 years and 3 years respectively we still have not seen a number of internal documents from either of those investigations, taxpayer funded investigations of taxpayer operations. My colleague, the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Hoyer], says this is all behind us, but the honest answer is we do not know if it is behind us because for decades these books simply have not been audited, nor have we had the access to those very documents. Former Congressman Dan Rostenkowski, now facing charges connected to the stationery store, has an intriguing defense. He says he was not the only Congressman who misused the stationery store and bought chairs and champagne buckets and other things, all with public money and all personal gifts. And you know his defense team might be right because we do not know, but after this audit is done, we will know, and when we know, you will know too.
Scott Klug: “let me tell you how fascinating it is for me to see you in your role tonight, and also see my good friend, the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of transparency in congressional financial investigations.
Share
More from Scott Klug
Mr. Chairman, let me just make a few brief points in closing because we are just about out of time on both sides. I simply want to make the point that, more so than anything else, if we are going to be interested in somebody's interest in…
319,000 dairy cows, to be more specific. Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Bilirakis], for his terrific work on behalf of this legislation, and also the full chairman of committee, the…
Let me make the point, we have had hearings on this. The question is, Where do the hearings have to happen? Do they have to happen here in Washington or in Wisconsin? Thirty hearings, town hall meetings, as my colleague, Mr. Sensenbrenner…
In the substitute that has been offered by our colleague from Wisconsin, the language says 'urge.' Is it the gentleman's reading that it does not compel the Secretary to act by August?





