In the substitute that has been offered by our colleague from Wisconsin, the language says 'urge.' Is it the gentleman's reading that it does not compel the Secretary to act by August?
Scott Klug: “In the substitute that has been offered by our colleague from Wisconsin, the language says 'urge.' Is it the gentleman's…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the language of a substitute amendment during a legislative discussion.
Share
More from Scott Klug
First of all, I think it is a test for Republicans, whether we are going to apply the same kind of scrutiny to the Pentagon that we apply to every other Federal agency. I heard my colleague from California, Mr. Hunter, come to the well a…
I think anything but the contrary. The public, which should be involved in this decision, has already been involved in the decision. It is the residents of the State of Wisconsin who had 30 hearings and town meetings, 120 hours of debate…
I will accept the premise that we could disagree on whether there is a subsidy involved here or not. But if I can, let me respectfully disagree on what essentially is simpler for the Federal Government to administer. Here is what happens…
it gets back to what I was talking about earlier with medical devices. It is part of that culture of fear. It is a fear within the FDA itself that they cannot say yes. If they say yes, it is that on-in-a-million chance that something will…





