Mr. President, it specifically provides for the ban of soft money which the Senator from Kentucky has denounced as an unconstitutional part of the McCain-Feingold bill. So this notion that somehow the Senator from Kentucky was not supportive of this kind of concept, at least at that time, does not seem to withstand scrutiny. Mr. President, I would also like at this time to spend a few moments talking a little bit about a very important item, and that is the proposal before us offered by the majority leader. That represents, to me, an attempt to put the onus of the entire campaign finance issue just on organized labor. That is the substantive impact of this proposal. But I am afraid the proposal is, in the end, going to serve a larger purpose, if it prevails. The majority leader made it pretty clear that was his purpose. The purpose of the proposal, it seems to me, is to kill the McCain-Feingold bill.
Russ Feingold: “Mr. President, it specifically provides for the ban of soft money which the Senator from Kentucky has denounced as an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing campaign finance reform and the implications of a proposal by the majority leader.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.
I would hope that the Kamala will use this as an opportunity to raise the obvious point that this country is deeply infected with racial injustice.
The founders of this country did not believe in political parties. They`ve called it faction.
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…





