I recognize there are strong feelings on this project and deep divisions in the region. I say to the junior Senator from Colorado, we must honor our commitment to this tribe. The question is how to honor the commitment. This project was first authorized in 1968. As I understand it, it had little or nothing to do at that time with the issue of water for the native American tribe. Three decades later, it has not been built. Realistically, my colleagues, it will never be built. It is not economically or fiscally feasible that we keep spending money on it. There are legitimate Indian needs that should be addressed and have to be addressed. Remember, only one-third of the water concerned here will go to native American tribes; two-thirds goes to others. Yet, there are substantial questions, in the end, under this project, that the tribes in consideration here will be able to obtain the water. This project is dead. Let us return to the drawing board and scale this down so it can meet our commitment without wasting substantial taxpayer dollars.
Russ Feingold: “I recognize there are strong feelings on this project and deep divisions in the region. I say to the junior Senator from…”
On the recordJuly 30, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Animas-La Plata water project and its implications for Native American tribes.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…
Jan 10, 2021
This is not just an insurrection. The oath they just took, Ari, was to defend against all enemies domestic or foreign. And these people were enemies of our country, domestic enemies who were trying destroy our government.
Mar 25, 2021
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.





