The legislation deletes language in current law expressly excluding donations to a national or state party committee specifically to finance the purchase or construction of a party office building from the definition of ``contribution.'' Accordingly, a national party committee may no longer receive non-Federal donations for the purpose of purchasing or constructing any party office building, or for any other purpose. Likewise, Federal law will no longer allow a State or local party committee to receive non-Federal donations to purchase or construct a State or local party office building where such donations would violate that State's laws relating to permissible sources and amounts of non-Federal donations to such a party committee. The bill does not, however, regulate State or local party expenditures of non-Federal donations received in accordance with State law on purchasing or constructing a State or local party office building.
Russ Feingold: “The legislation deletes language in current law expressly excluding donations to a national or state party committee…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a soft money ban on party committee donations.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I believe this can be done. I do understand the desire to, of course, give Biden a chance to have his first 100 days. But I think people should especially think in terms of what is most likely to lead to a serious opportunity to vote on…
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…
President Biden has stressed repeatedly that human rights must be at the center of our foreign policy, and I could not agree more.
It is clearly constitutional to hold this trial now and to have the vote on disqualification.





