I think it would be devastating. I mean, it would--I think it would require us to fundamentally reexamine our nuclear deterrent strategy.
Adam Smith
The Public Record
Adam Smith is a U.S. Representative for Washington's 9th congressional district, serving since 1997. A member of the Democratic Party, he has focused on various legislative efforts, particularly in defense and foreign policy. Throughout his tenure, Smith has been involved in key discussions and initiatives related to national security and military funding, reflecting his commitment to these issues. He has also been an advocate for progressive policies within his district and has worked on legislation addressing economic and social challenges faced by his constituents.
if we continue on a journey of sequestration and have to make those kind of choices, that will be detrimental to our national defense structure.
I agree with that prioritization and I support the funding in this year's base budget request that protects the nuclear triad and other nuclear deterrent capabilities.
many Members are very adamant that we need that nuclear deterrent strategy, we need that triad. Sequestration makes that impossible.
I am increasingly troubled by the aggressive counter-space programs of China and Russia, in particular.
I hope these sobering remarks remind us to not lose sight of our shared values and the vital importance of reversing the dangerous budget trajectory.
Wishful thinking is not a strategy to pin our force structure decisions upon.
I worry that the Department is justifying its deep cuts to the Army based on this set of unrealistic assumptions.
The good news is we do still have the most powerful, capable Navy and Marine Corps in the world.
If we are going to be able to maintain that capability, we are going to have to make some very, very tough choices going forward.





