the world order that existed for, you know, a long time post World War II is stressed and requires some changes.
It is perfectly okay to push our allies that they need to contribute more.
I think it is, you know, without question true at this point that the world order that existed for, you know, a long time post World War II ...
All of the campaign promises that the administration made, they don't add up, so something has got to give.
we were not entering an arms race because we bilaterally have a verifiable inspection regime for the weapons that are deployed.
I believe the New START Treaty remains in the national security interest of the United States as long as Russia complies with its terms.
Anyone who thinks they can control escalation through the use of nuclear weapons is literally playing with fire.
Escalation is escalation, and nuclear use would be the ultimate escalation.
We were not entering an arms race because we bilaterally have a verifiable inspection regime for the weapons that are deployed.
Is there a way that we can do this in a more cost-effective manner?
I think we should maintain our policy of not using them first and using them as a credible deterrent.