The Supreme Court has been making decisions with outcomes that are very contrary to the public interest.
Peter Welch
The Public Record
Peter Francis Welch is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Vermont's at-large congressional district since 2007. A member of the Democratic Party, Welch has focused on issues such as healthcare, agriculture, and climate change during his tenure in Congress. He has been an advocate for policies aimed at supporting Vermont's farmers and addressing the challenges posed by rising healthcare costs.
we have a corrupt campaign finance system, yet the Supreme Court, in Citizens United, made an assertion of facts to justify unleashing unlimited money.
in the Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court disregarded precedent and stare decisis in order to achieve an outcome that we're now living with.
the Supreme Court has been making decisions with outcomes that are very contrary to the public interest.
the United States Supreme Court, in many recent decisions, has, in my view, become a threat to democracy.
I rise today to recognize the 30th anniversary of the U.S. Green Building Council--USGBC--founded in April 1993. This member-led, nonprofit organization has helped schools, businesses, cities, and even countries build and operate better…
in the Bruen decision, the United States Supreme Court came up with a framework of analysis, so-called 'historical analysis,' which essentially made up a history.
You know, that is actually helpful, because I think, while we are talking about the frustration, we here can legislate the program, hopefully come up with some money.
You know, that is actually helpful, because I think, while we are talking about the frustration, we here can legislate the program, hopefully come up with some money.
It is immensely beneficial if there can be flexibility. No. 2, there is hell to pay when the flexibility leads to no accountability.
It is immensely beneficial if there can be flexibility. No. 2, there is hell to pay when the flexibility leads to no accountability.
It is immensely beneficial if there can be flexibility. No. 2, there is hell to pay when the flexibility leads to no accountability.
You know, that is actually helpful, because I think, while we are talking about the frustration, we here can legislate the program, hopefully come up with some money.
I rise to voice my support for S. 316, a bill to repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq. Sending America's sons and daughters to fight in foreign lands has serious consequences. Those who volunteer for military…
Why shouldn't it be the decision of the passenger as opposed to the convenience of the airline to determine whether they want cash back?
the 1,500-hour rule doesn't have any relevance to the actual performance of a pilot.
Why shouldn't it be the decision of the passenger as opposed to the convenience of the airline to determine whether they want cash back?
the 1,500-hour rule for training pilots has really become an impediment to replenishing the pilot work force.
I have never understood why they really need that nonrefundable ticket, other than it is a way they can extract more money.
the 1,500-hour rule for training pilots has really become an impediment to replenishing the pilot work force.





