Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the Forbes Joint Forces Command Amendment. The establishment of a combatant command requires a literal act of Congress. It follows, then, that the closure of a combatant command should involve thoughtful analysis that is shared with this body for comment. The closure of Joint Forces Command fails on that important count. Either no such analysis has been conducted or it is being withheld. Mr. Chairman, the absence of data that supports the closure of a combatant command is simply unacceptable. Accordingly, this cost neutral amendment delays its closure. Mr. Chairman, I ask my colleagues to join me in voting in favor of the Forbes Joint Forces Command amendment.
Scott Rigell: “Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the Forbes Joint Forces Command Amendment. The establishment of a combatant…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing the need for analysis before closing a combatant command.
Share
More from Scott Rigell
But this is clearly the most egregious example of basically a quid pro quo and the negative that is if you do something, I'll take something away.
I'm convinced that so many Members of Congress of my own former party suppress their conscience and their better judgment out of fear and I think submission to Donald Trump.
As a fiscal conservative and as a Republican, I believe that we fought for this a lot harder, though, and I want to walk through that just a little bit.
Trump is a bully, unworthy of our nomination. My love for our country eclipses my loyalty to our party and to live with a clear conscience. I will not support a nominee so lacking in the judgment, temperament and judgment and character…





