But this is clearly the most egregious example of basically a quid pro quo and the negative that is if you do something, I'll take something away.
Scott Rigell: “But this is clearly the most egregious example of basically a quid pro quo and the negative that is if you do something…”
Editor's note · Context
Rigell's criticism of Trump's conditional endorsement of Governor Dunleavy.
Share
More from Scott Rigell
I think the commissioner put it in because it is a sincerely and deeply held assessment and a troubling one of the agency.
I want an aspirational leader that I could say to my son and grandson, grow up to be like him or her. And he fails that test miserably.
I cannot, in good conscience, if Donald Trump is our nominee, I cannot vote for him because of what I -- the risk that I think I put my own country in terms of foreign policy and use of military force.
Trump is a bully, unworthy of our nomination. My love for our country eclipses my loyalty to our party and to live with a clear conscience. I will not support a nominee so lacking in the judgment, temperament and judgment and character…





