On the recordJanuary 29, 2018
And I disagree, just based on the debate that we had when we were doing this a number of years ago in 2013, because we anticipated there would be continued office use.
Source
congress.govHoward Griffith: “And I disagree, just based on the debate that we had when we were doing this a number of years ago in 2013, because we…”
Editor's note · Context
Griffith emphasizes a disagreement based on past legislative expectations regarding office use of prescriptions.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
Feb 5, 2025
I understand there are all kinds of concerns on the other side of the aisle, but we are talking about the HALT Fentanyl Act. I could stand here and talk about Burma. We heard today that the President has extended the emergency situation…
Apr 30, 2025
I am not against States' rights. I am against creating a super State in California because they are the only ones that are entitled to get a waiver and then claiming, as the Government Accountability Office, that they have some kind of…
Feb 26, 2025
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Begich). The gentleman from Virginia has 10 minutes remaining. The gentleman from New Jersey has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Apr 30, 2025
Point of parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Miller of Illinois). The gentleman from Virginia will state his parliamentary inquiry.
Other voices in this conversation
